Even if you’ve suffered significant losses and are feeling down on yourself, betting methods will do little to alleviate your distress and frustration. Alternatively, you may choose to take the L and vow never to do it again, or, if you’re really motivated, you can look into gambling techniques that may provide a genuine edge.
If you have lost more money than you anticipated, there is nothing you can do to undo what has already happened. Of course, this is the first step toward acceptance, so we shouldn’t get ahead of ourselves here.
I’m aware that some proponents of betting systems get enraged when they publish!!! The math bullies, with their harsh language and difficult calculations, are not popular among the students. They will go to any length to attempt to prove us incorrect, or at the very least, to claim that we are unable to establish our case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Let’s look at a few of examples:
1.) Supporter of Betting Systems
Attempting to persuade himself and those who are more knowledgeable about something that does not work and does not alter a player’s expectation in a casino.
Has lost a lot of money at casinos in the past, sometimes catastrophically, and claims to be looking for a method to win that does not really entail finding a way to earn money. Or, for that matter, performing any meaningful work at all.
After becoming upset, she often makes grandiose and sweeping comments about how math bullies are not dealing with facts or the “Real World,” despite the fact that probability is something that exists and affects the outcome of many aspects of our daily lives. Every step of the way, he is completely unable to offer any logically or mathematically acceptable counter-argument since there is no such thing.
2.) Math Bully Mission—-I’m overjoyed that people are recognizing negative expectation games for what they are, and that they are not playing them in general. He is delighted to see that all negative expectation bets are not optimum by virtue of their very character as negative expectation bets, as well as to know the exact anticipated loss of any negative expectation bets he may place.
Within reason, I am willing to give formulae and assertions of a logical and mathematically sound type in order to show, as clearly as most people could, that the player’s expectation is to lose.
A person who cheerfully accepts reality for what it is, and, if he chooses to play, who does not reject the fact that he would ultimately lose if he continued to play for an extended period of time
Is it possible to get so enraged that one refuses to acknowledge reality? This is, in the words of Tony Stark, “not a brilliant idea.”
What do some of these individuals do for a living? They enter a Forum, such as WoV, with known math-heavy members and continue to make fruitless attempts to argue in favor of a pointless proposal in order to get attention and support. They get enraged when confronted with mathematical truths that have been well-reasoned and supported by evidence. Disappointed because, once again, it has been shown that subtracting a negative number from a negative number results in another negative number.
It’s as if you’re staging your own intervention every day of your life and marching into it as if you’re about to engage in combat. Unfortunately for them, there are no swords involved (in which case they could win), just brains and logical propositions—-and they have chosen the side of the debate that can only lose.
Another difference between this and an alcoholic’s intervention is that some of the people involved in this intervention aren’t going to care about your feelings all that much, so they won’t necessarily be inclined to approach the discussion with “Kid gloves,” as they would in an alcoholic’s intervention.
Sorry for the inconvenience. Facts are hard to deal with, and I’m no exception.